> The rest of the posts were good reading, but getting the emotion involved just makes everyone mad. For my part, there was no emotion involved. That's why I

> The rest of the posts were good reading, but getting the emotion involved just makes everyone mad. For my part, there was no emotion involved. That's why I didn't bother replying to the emotional aspects of timr's second post. > Neither of the commenters cared anymore about their argument, they only cared about winning. I care a lot about the argument; I think Poul's article was interesting and relevant, and should not be dismissed by people who (it seems clearly to be the case) did not understand it, but think they did.