Yeah... We eventually hit "Do we have no conveyance of knowledge when you cannot simulate with successive attempts?" Which is not what I generally class as chi

Yeah... We eventually hit "Do we have no conveyance of knowledge when you cannot simulate with successive attempts?" Which is not what I generally class as children's-story language. But the statistical argument is even harder - accepting that a low enough probability (more accurately, p value) implies a non-random source of a phenomenon is not obvious. I suspect that the initial usage would be ok, where Ali Baba says he didn't guess wrong 40 times. But the coin flip idea with Mick isn't intuitive and isn't really explained. The lead-in is interesting, and it's a clever story, but it lost the plot on target audience pretty badly.