4 ms·

Revived as in what? Make people believe that 1 million of fart apps is worth paying for? How much value do you put on apps that superimpose dog ears on people i

Revived as in what? Make people believe that 1 million of fart apps is worth paying for? How much value do you put on apps that superimpose dog ears on people in real time video/camera? How many apps have you downloaded and how many are actually useful to you?

matt4077 9y ago
You're kinda proving my point.
- rantanplan 9y ago
  Yeah, I probably misinterpreted what point you were trying to make.
mwfunk 9y ago
It's hardly Apple's fault that people aren't willing to pay big money for fart apps. If you want to put a $10 fart app out there, it's not like anyone's stopping you from doing it. Speaking for myself at least, I've purchased quite a few mobile apps over the years. If I need an app in a certain category, I will always get one that costs money over one that's free with ads. I'm sure I'm in the minority, but people like me don't have to be the majority for someone to make money from an app. The only thing that matters is the number of people like me out there, not the percentage of total users we represent. I do think there's much room for improvement of course. I wish they would do stuff like allow people to offer paid upgrades. But claiming that there are literally no good paid apps is just silly.
- eeZah7Ux 9y ago
  > It's hardly Apple's fault that people aren't willing to pay big money for fart apps. Apple encouraged a market of many cheap-as-in-shoddy $.99 apps instead of inexpensive yet useful and reliable software.
  - rantanplan 9y ago
    A million times this. So basically they conned people into a walled garden without providing any of the benefits they explicitly(or implicitly) promised. As long as they get 30% of fart apps, who cares, right?
  - criddell 9y ago
    A lot of those $.99 apps are useful and reliable enough. I'm constantly amazed at how well made cheap or free apps are. Yes, Sturgeon's Law is a thing, but the apps that aren't crap are often very good.
  - mwfunk 9y ago
    How did they actively encourage that situation, what could possibly be their motivation for wanting that situation (surely they'd rather have 30% of a $10 app vs. 30% of a $1 or free app), and what would you have them do to change that situation? There are literally millions of people who would love to have a healthier market for paid mobile apps, including the company itself. Since you've clearly got the answers and we're all just out here in the wilderness scraping sticks together, please share your insights for the sake of the entire industry.
a-fake-account 9y ago
Do you play video games?

matt4077 9y ago

You're kinda proving my point.

rantanplan 9y ago
Yeah, I probably misinterpreted what point you were trying to make.

mwfunk 9y ago

It's hardly Apple's fault that people aren't willing to pay big money for fart apps. If you want to put a $10 fart app out there, it's not like anyone's stopping you from doing it. Speaking for myself at least, I've purchased quite a few mobile apps over the years. If I need an app in a certain category, I will always get one that costs money over one that's free with ads. I'm sure I'm in the minority, but people like me don't have to be the majority for someone to make money from an app. The only thing that matters is the number of people like me out there, not the percentage of total users we represent. I do think there's much room for improvement of course. I wish they would do stuff like allow people to offer paid upgrades. But claiming that there are literally no good paid apps is just silly.

eeZah7Ux 9y ago
> It's hardly Apple's fault that people aren't willing to pay big money for fart apps. Apple encouraged a market of many cheap-as-in-shoddy $.99 apps instead of inexpensive yet useful and reliable software.
- rantanplan 9y ago
  A million times this. So basically they conned people into a walled garden without providing any of the benefits they explicitly(or implicitly) promised. As long as they get 30% of fart apps, who cares, right?
- criddell 9y ago
  A lot of those $.99 apps are useful and reliable enough. I'm constantly amazed at how well made cheap or free apps are. Yes, Sturgeon's Law is a thing, but the apps that aren't crap are often very good.
- mwfunk 9y ago
  How did they actively encourage that situation, what could possibly be their motivation for wanting that situation (surely they'd rather have 30% of a $10 app vs. 30% of a $1 or free app), and what would you have them do to change that situation? There are literally millions of people who would love to have a healthier market for paid mobile apps, including the company itself. Since you've clearly got the answers and we're all just out here in the wilderness scraping sticks together, please share your insights for the sake of the entire industry.

a-fake-account 9y ago

Do you play video games?