4 ms·
your first point coupled with diminishing free air range in bands above 40kHz makes this hack seem like a futile attempt to simply gather as much data as possib
by posterboy 10y ago
your first point coupled with diminishing free air range in bands above 40kHz makes this hack seem like a futile attempt to simply gather as much data as possible, as low or uncorrelated as it might be. Some phones might be more cappable than others, however, and air is dense enough for several meters of significant ultrasound transmission at low power. With e.g. Samsung TVs always listening, I wouldn't be surprised if they optimized the speakers and micros in that regards, while benign applications aren't out of the question either.
The second point however is an overly broad generalisation disregarding the technical inaptitude of the target group of such apps (wherein I might include myself).
- URSpider94 10y agoI don't think people are using true ultrasound, e.g. 40kHz. In most cases, it's more like "poor man's ultrasound" at 19 kHz, Just outside the hearing range of most people. They have to stay as close as possible to the human hearing range to avoid audio low-pass filters and simple capability envelope of the speakers and microphones.