3 ms·
Well, the video codec doesn't handle audio anyway, so neither am I. The container format is what I suspect you mean, and Matroska can handle just about anythin
by jungletek 9y ago
Well, the video codec doesn't handle audio anyway, so neither am I.
The container format is what I suspect you mean, and Matroska can handle just about anything. There are others, but that was the first off the top of my head, and IMO the only one worth using these days whenever possible.
This wikipedia chart is useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_container_formats https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_container_...
- eridius 9y agoI don't think I've seen an .mkv in literally years. I didn't think video recorders recorded in that format either. .mp4 and .mpeg are still the video containers that I see 99% of the time (note: I don't use a WebM-capable browser, so I don't see WebM videos).
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]