> defied the odds and rewarded investors with a historically normal 7.1 percent nine-year annualized return I know, past performance is not an indicator of fut

> defied the odds and rewarded investors with a historically normal 7.1 percent nine-year annualized return I know, past performance is not an indicator of future outcomes, but when talking odds, surely decades worth of data showing historical returns in a similar range, the odds in this case would be skewed towards preferring a continuation of that trend.