2 ms·
You can load balance your app for 3.5k $ on additional server. By reducing load, time spend in GC will be less. Additionality by having more hardware you can us
by Chyzwar 9y ago
You can load balance your app for 3.5k $ on additional server. By reducing load, time spend in GC will be less. Additionality by having more hardware you can use more aggressive strategy[0].
[0]http://www.cakesolutions.net/teamblogs/low-pause-gc-on-the-jvm http://www.cakesolutions.net/teamblogs/low-pause-gc-on-the-j...
- jonaf 9y agoI have taken Zing for a spin on 24 c3.8xl ec2 instances running Elasticsearch with 32G heaps and just under 2 billion indexed documents with millions of updates/day. The results are considerably better. If I just went up to 30 or even 50 ec2 instances on HotSpot/Openjdk, I would see no performance benefit with regard to GC. And I have performed this test. I'm not saying dont use Java because of GC, but I am saying don't overestimate the value of more efficient garbage collection in any case. Shoutout to the Azul guys, Simon, Elaine and Paul for coming on-site and watch me compile all their extensions on Amazon Linux and help me perform all the testing.