4 ms·

I like how there are no classes, that's how I personally like CSS. Shameless plug: I'm the author of a similar library, with a minimal amount of classes, but i

by kbr 9y ago

I like how there are no classes, that's how I personally like CSS. Shameless plug: I'm the author of a similar library, with a minimal amount of classes, but it offers more functionality (a grid, components, navigation, etc). http://usewing.ml http://usewing.ml

zmoreira 9y ago
Looks nice.
mattbgates 9y ago
You changed it up a bit, but it is like a cousin to the Skeleton framework. Anyways, every project I do gets a new CSS framework just to keep things interesting for my users and myself... I don't use the same one twice. I'm particular in what and how I choose a user-interface, and this framework is definitely on my list.
- kbr 9y ago
  Yup, Skeleton is the main inspiration, Wing just provides a bit more: it uses flexbox, has a minimal grid system (one class), and navigation + card components. I like the idea of not using the same CSS framework, it seems pretty cool, and you can quickly learn about which one suits you best. Glad to see Wing is on your list :D
  - mattbgates 9y ago
    It's all about learning new things... if I keep using the same one over and over, than I'm sure I'd be great at it, but its the same code. And every CSS framework has a unique look that offers something new and different. I also think it helps give the creators a bit more exposure too for their work and I'm sure it is just as exciting for you to see what kind of designs people come up with using your framework. I tend to love the "minimalistic" look of frameworks. KISS.
    - kbr 9y ago
      Yup, getting exposed to a variety of new things is great, you learn a lot, and have a lot of different styles. I agree, and thank you for helping creators get exposure for their work. I'm sure it makes their day when someone uses their framework, and it sure does for me :) Minimalistic frameworks FTW! I don't like the ones where there are a ton of classes to learn, or when they are complex (like ".o-s-c-3-4").

by kbr 9y ago

zmoreira 9y ago

Looks nice.

mattbgates 9y ago

You changed it up a bit, but it is like a cousin to the Skeleton framework. Anyways, every project I do gets a new CSS framework just to keep things interesting for my users and myself... I don't use the same one twice. I'm particular in what and how I choose a user-interface, and this framework is definitely on my list.

kbr 9y ago
Yup, Skeleton is the main inspiration, Wing just provides a bit more: it uses flexbox, has a minimal grid system (one class), and navigation + card components. I like the idea of not using the same CSS framework, it seems pretty cool, and you can quickly learn about which one suits you best. Glad to see Wing is on your list :D
- mattbgates 9y ago
  It's all about learning new things... if I keep using the same one over and over, than I'm sure I'd be great at it, but its the same code. And every CSS framework has a unique look that offers something new and different. I also think it helps give the creators a bit more exposure too for their work and I'm sure it is just as exciting for you to see what kind of designs people come up with using your framework. I tend to love the "minimalistic" look of frameworks. KISS.
  - kbr 9y ago
    Yup, getting exposed to a variety of new things is great, you learn a lot, and have a lot of different styles. I agree, and thank you for helping creators get exposure for their work. I'm sure it makes their day when someone uses their framework, and it sure does for me :) Minimalistic frameworks FTW! I don't like the ones where there are a ton of classes to learn, or when they are complex (like ".o-s-c-3-4").