3 ms·
It's my guess that Mailinator is extremely irrelevant to their plan. They planned to propagate via BCC but they needed a "To:" address - preferably one that di
by mailinatorguy 9y ago
It's my guess that Mailinator is extremely irrelevant to their plan.
They planned to propagate via BCC but they needed a "To:" address - preferably one that didn't bounce.
So they hit the "h" key awhile, then added @mailinator.com
- fastest963 9y agoWhy didn't they just send the email to the recipient? What does the BCC add in this context?
- thehappy 9y agoBCC recipients can't see (or contact) each other to mitigate the spread. If you look at the source code, it BCCs 99 contacts from the infected account per message.
- meowface 9y agoWould it have made a difference if they made the "To:" a non-existent address? Would a bounce also prevent delivery to BCC recipients?
- AstralStorm 9y agoTechnically, they have to defeat greylisting and server validity checks anyway to get mails accepted to most modern mail servers.