3 ms·
I find it difficult to adhere to the meaning of guidelines like this, because I don't know exactly what they intend. For example, I would say what I did in a fa
by p_zakharov 9y ago
I find it difficult to adhere to the meaning of guidelines like this, because I don't know exactly what they intend. For example, I would say what I did in a face-to-face conversation, and I don't think I'm being gratuitously negative.
- Blahah 9y agoWhat your comment (and followup) shows is that you think some other people's behaviour makes them deserve HIV. That's an utterly intolerable position, and especially so in this community. Nobody deserves HIV.
- p_zakharov 9y agoWhy is it intolerable? I think many who have HIV now deserved it because of their licentious behavior.
- p_zakharov 9y agoWhat about the degenerate subculture of "bug chasers"? Aren't they literally asking for it?
- sctb 9y agoWe've banned this account.
- sctb 9y agoThis case is well covered by the guideline that says: > Please avoid introducing classic flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say about them.
- p_zakharov 9y agoI haven't obviously broken that rule. Is it even a classic flame war topic? I've seen more flame wars about vim vs. emacs than I have about this issue, at least how I framed it.