8 ms·
I don't get his outrage, one side will always complain. Depending on the state they could lose or gain rights if the feds transferred it. But the feds and stat
by easilyBored 9y ago
I don't get his outrage, one side will always complain. Depending on the state they could lose or gain rights if the feds transferred it.
But the feds and states are quite separate when it comes to taxes, budgets etc so why shouldn't both own land too?
- theparanoid 9y agoBy law federal public lands are multi-use, e.g. hunting, fishing, camping. States have no such proviso.