3 ms·
I'm hoping it's some kind of temporal fuzzing where particles are going backwards in time and causing interference with both past and future events. No reason
by astrodust 10y ago
I'm hoping it's some kind of temporal fuzzing where particles are going backwards in time and causing interference with both past and future events.
No reason other than because that'd be awesome.
- imranq 10y agoYou mean like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93Feynman_absorber_theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93Feynman_absorb...
- idlewords 10y agoThey just need to reverse polarity on the LHC!
- patejam 10y agoWould it even be possible to measure this?
- astrodust 10y agoExactly. It'd be so downright bizarre and difficult to pin down that we'd probably go nuts thinking we were all delusional to imagine such a thing could exist in the first place. Then when we have proof we'd be even more confused.
- mrmaximus 10y agoI'd settle for figuring out how to send an email to a previous point in time. I'd like to email myself in 2009. Something about buying a bunch of ASIC's and mining something for a long-term hold.
- stouset 10y agoNo need to mine it. Just buy in bulk at $1 and hold.
- ufmace 10y agoBitcoin market cap is still pretty small as far as global financial markets go. I'd have doubts at being able to extract serious amount of money from it. I'd bet you can find something much more conventional to invest in that'll produce big gains that can be extracted easily.
- astrodust 10y agoYou know in that timeline you'd spend a fortune on ASIC mining hardware and the market would tank because Murphy's Law could not possibly resist showing up and ruining the party.