4 ms·
"plus you're in a city with an international airport hub." >pays an extra $30,000 a year to live near SFO >saves $50 on a flight to Asia once a year rational
by imjustsaying 9y ago
"plus you're in a city with an international airport hub."
>pays an extra $30,000 a year to live near SFO
>saves $50 on a flight to Asia once a year
rationale checks out
- haihaibye 9y agoIt works for the CEOs who make the decision.
- astrange 9y agoLiving near a major airport gives them a lower chance of seat upgrades, though. Nobody in ATL ever gets Delta 360.
- macNchz 9y agoIf you like to travel and fly a few times a year, being near a major airport may not be justifiable financially but removes so many pain points from the process. I definitely travel more than I would if it was more difficult. I grew up in a small town far from any airport and traveled internationally regularly. We either drove 50 miles to a small regional airport, which meant we'd have layovers and connections flying almost anywhere (more chances for lost luggage!), or we drove three+ hours to a big airport with expensive parking. Landing after a long international flight and having to get in the car and drive for three hours is a terrible way to end a trip. These days I live within a 30 minute cab ride of LGA or JFK. The availability of flights and the ease of getting to and from the airport makes a huge difference in how annoying it is to fly. Cheap early morning flights don't require pulling an all nighter, there are direct flights to so many cities, and the wheels-down-to-hot-shower-and-beer-at-home time is so short.