3 ms·
Clearly, your only experience with WWDC was the keynote. If you had bothered to look into anything else about the conference, you would know that the entire res
by stevejohnson 16y ago
Clearly, your only experience with WWDC was the keynote. If you had bothered to look into anything else about the conference, you would know that the entire rest of the week is filled with tech talks about relevant technologies (both newly announced and pre-existing) and labs staffed by every breed of Apple engineer.
What I'm trying to say is that WWDC has not been overrun by "non-developers." The keynote is the only part of the event open to the press, and they exploit it as much as they can, but the rest of the conference really is devoted to working with useful, relevant technology.
This is not to say that WWDC is better or worse than I/O, just that bloggers have not hijacked the event from real developers.
- ergo98 16y ago>The keynote is the only part of the event open to the press What's with the WWDC defensiveness? Seriously, relax. They keynote sees a lot of press, many of whom got press passes. Yet it also sees a lot of less credible press (e.g. Gizmodo) who buy standard event tickets, clogging a spot, to be there. The same thing happened at I/O. And I've met enough non-developers who were sent there for whatever reason to realize that it isn't the core of developers.