3 ms·
I did a blog post last year that compared DigitalOcean, Vultr, and my 7 year old laptop for my Git indexing engine. Vultr performed better than DigitalOcean in
by sdesol 9y ago
I did a blog post last year that compared DigitalOcean, Vultr, and my 7 year old laptop for my Git indexing engine. Vultr performed better than DigitalOcean in all my tests.
You can find the numbers at https://gitsense.com/blog/benchmarking-march-14-2016.html https://gitsense.com/blog/benchmarking-march-14-2016.html
I probably should run the tests again to see how things have changed though.
- sdesol 9y agoSo I ran a few tests by indexing https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode and these were the results DO - $10 | Vultr - $5 | Vultr - $10 ----------------------------------- 00:38:59 | 00:31:58 | 00:29:43 Indexing produced 64 searchable branches and as the above shows, Vultr easily outperformed DigitalOcean, at half the price. Edit: To put the numbers into perspective, I ran another test in a virtual machine with VirtualBox on my local desktop and finished indexing in 00:21:29 I allocated 1 virtual core and 1 GB of RAM for the virtual machine. The desktop processor is an i5-4460 @3.20GHz
- h1d 9y agoThanks for the numbers. As Vultr and Linode provide double the memory and other benefits for same price as DO, unless DO provides better plans, it's becoming a bit of a joke concerning raw performance / $.