3 ms·
I don't know why this pledge has to take a position on immigration policy. A flood of low-skilled, poorly educated immigrants definitely helps the rich who don
by rhapsodic 9y ago
I don't know why this pledge has to take a position on immigration policy.
A flood of low-skilled, poorly educated immigrants definitely helps the rich who don't mow their own lawns or make their own beds, and corporations who benefit from the wage-suppressing effects of a huge surplus low-skilled and poorly educated workers. But it hurts American citizens who are themselves low-skilled and poorly educated.
I know it's not a popular opinion here, but I happen to think that US immigration policy should be crafted solely on what is in the US's best interests. Allowing highly-skilled and highly educated people in helps the country, but I don't really see how allowing a flood of low-skilled immigrants in helps the country in the larger picture. I understand how it does from the Adam Smith/Milton Friedman perspective, but I don't think that benefit justifies the harm done to the most vulnerable workers (or would-be workers) who are citizens and taxpayers and in many cases veterans of our military.
- tchaffee 9y agoWhile I am pro immigration and pro freedom of movement in general (so I mostly disagree with your stance in general), I can't deny that the current immigration rules have been mostly to the benefit of making tech company owners richer by hiring highly skilled people at indentured servitude wages. Truly free markets would allow immigrants to change employer at will. Suffice it to say that this issue is controversial enough that it doesn't belong in a simple code of ethics. We agree on that.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]