3 ms·
Agreed. There was a remarkable difference between 2017 DockerCon and 2016. I felt right at place in 2016 but 2017... just missed the mark. Felt very much like a
by meddlepal 10y ago
Agreed. There was a remarkable difference between 2017 DockerCon and 2016. I felt right at place in 2016 but 2017... just missed the mark. Felt very much like all the session were geared toward "Introducing Docker" or "How to convince your manager about Docker".
Oh well :\
- shykes 10y agoDid you try any of the black belt track? It seems like that might have been a good fit for you. One problem with the Austin convention center is that it's VERY spread out, so it's easy to miss an entire chunk of sessions because they're almost impossibly far if you don't know what you're looking for.
- bdcravens 10y agoI think the app and sessions guide did a pretty good job of informing about sessions, but I'll second the point about the layout of the Austin convention center. For those not in perfect health (I have a lung condition) it was a bit .. extreme. Probably the longest hikes of any conference I've ever been to.
- cookiecaper 10y agoIf only more of us had managers that needed convincing to switch to Docker. As this thread insinuates, Docker is a VC-driven fad that has been seized upon by posers as the next buzzword to plaster across their resume. I wish more engineering managers were willing to stand up to this nonsense.