The problem with this 10X myth is that no one ever defines X. Lines of code? Inverse of defects found? Delivering in 1/10 of estimates? There is no definitive w

The problem with this 10X myth is that no one ever defines X. Lines of code? Inverse of defects found? Delivering in 1/10 of estimates? There is no definitive way to measure the end result of what people develop and any of these values can be gamed. Clearly there are major differences between programmers but turning it into math is not really possible.