3 ms·
He did not say that, but it's natural to assume that. All android phones run android (naturally) so if for whatever reason you believe iOS to be more secure and
by 0xCMP 9y ago
He did not say that, but it's natural to assume that. All android phones run android (naturally) so if for whatever reason you believe iOS to be more secure and you also know most android phones do not receive updates correctly then it's probably easier to avoid all android phones than try to accurately predict the development roadmaps for companies other than Google's flagship phones.
Personally, I think Android itself was not designed with as strong security as iOS because it was designed for openness and this has turned out to be a problem. One which iOS has to a much lesser extent.
- sangnoir 9y ago> Personally, I think Android itself was not designed with as strong security as iOS because it was designed for openness and this has turned out to be a problem. Openness and security are orthogonal - it is possible for a software to be both open and secure: see OpenBSD.
- 0xCMP 9y agoI completely agree, by "openness" I meant the lack of ACL/permissions for different data. This is improving on Android, but I don't keep up with it anymore so I'm not sure how much they've caught up or if what is released/planned is marketing hype. Of course, Android has always sandboxed and prevented apps from talking to each other directly, but the restrictions on iOS have also always been much higher. iOS has never had the issues Android has had with SD cards. As someone who became an Android developer almost right after it came out, it was this freedom that attracted me.
- tptacek 9y agoI am in fact implying that there are some Android phones that experts might be able to configure to a point of security comparable to iOS.