I'm not sure what your point is. They don't try to tease out whether it was raw computing power or better algorithms, just that it was tens of trillions of tim

I'm not sure what your point is. They don't try to tease out whether it was raw computing power or better algorithms, just that it was tens of trillions of times more computed. Also, minor nitpicking -- they said papers not paper, likely meaning the first several years to decade of it.