2 ms·
In fairness, luaffifb seems to give the same feature. I think the main argument against Lua + luaffifb is that it might require an external dependency: luarock
by sillysaurus3 10y ago
In fairness, luaffifb seems to give the same feature.
I think the main argument against Lua + luaffifb is that it might require an external dependency: luarocks. Whereas if someone were to theoretically provide Lua integration with emacs, it might be a good idea to offer the ffi library as a baseline feature.
This is a weak argument, because it should be possible to embed luaffifb plus Lua inside of a linked library, with no need to depend on luarocks.
It's probably best to explore both options.
- shalabhc 10y agoWell, LuaJIT will also JIT compile Lua code operating on C structures - so speed could be another big argument.