> The second paper suggests that immigration is needed to bring more highly-skilled and highly-educated workers to the U.S. That aspect is indeed covered, howe

> The second paper suggests that immigration is needed to bring more highly-skilled and highly-educated workers to the U.S. That aspect is indeed covered, however you will notice is a small constituent of what was proposed. Much of the bill is focused on the increased labor participation for low-skilled work (also includes protection for the skilled US jobs, countering that original point) as well as the increased GDP expected due to more people to provide loans to etc. Also, put it in context of the distribution of skill level in the jobs filled by immigration. Any of these papers can be quoted to support either side tbh, it can be quite hard to decipher and see the bigger picture.