5 ms·
Xvfb is way harder to setup. Also, I assume it uses less ressources so it scales better.
by simlevesque 10y ago
Xvfb is way harder to setup. Also, I assume it uses less ressources so it scales better.
- codewithcheese 10y agoYes, I assume that the drawing process may be different. However, it's probably still possible to take a screenshot. I would like to know what sort of performance differential I can expect.
- floatboth 10y agoScreenshot functionality is, in fact, advertised in the linked article.
- cryptarch 9y agoI use xvfb-run on Debian and it's a breeze: xvfb-run -s '-screen 0 1280x1024x8' ./cucumber Or are you using more advanced Xvfb features, or perhaps running inside containers?
- michaelmcmillan 9y agoIn my experience it's not a breeze: https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium/issues/87#issuecomment-297944128 https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/docker-selenium/issues/87#issu...
- bdcravens 9y agoxvfb can be a bit tough to setup, but Selenium's Docker images make this a breeze, and they even have a debug mode with automatic VNC.