3 ms·
I suspect they got wrapped around the axle on too much industrial design and painted themselves into a corner where they couldn't upgrade it easily. The ROI of
by basseq 9y ago
I suspect they got wrapped around the axle on too much industrial design and painted themselves into a corner where they couldn't upgrade it easily. The ROI of going back to the drawing board so soon was a non-starter.
They're not yet at the point where their developers' grumblings are having a material negative impact on the bottom line. Yet.
I hope they don't make the same mistake twice. But I don't think a hackintosh-inspired tower with the upgrade path left solely to the buyer would be a good strategy.
- basseq 9y agoAlso, note[1] that Apple isn't being stupid here. Their strategy was just wrong (namely expansion via Thunderbolt peripherals and multi-GPU performance). John Gruber suggests this is a bit of an "Oh Shit" moment for Apple, too. [1] https://daringfireball.net/2017/04/the_mac_pro_lives https://daringfireball.net/2017/04/the_mac_pro_lives
- iainmerrick 9y agoMaybe not stupid, but very slow on the uptake. If they'd been taking the temperature of the community properly, they wouldn't have been surprised when the reaction to their new MacBook Pros was "okay, whatever, but what about the desktops?"
- basseq 9y agoGruber asserts it's the opposite: Even among pro users, notebooks are by far the most popular Macs. In second place are iMacs. The Mac Pro is third. Apple declined to describe the Mac Pro’s share of all Mac sales any more specifically than “a single- digit percent”, but my gut feeling is that the single digit is a lot closer to 1 than it is to 9.
- iainmerrick 9y agoI meant critical reaction, not sales. It's true that critics don't always represent the silent happy majority. But if there weren't a real problem, they wouldn't be scrambling to show their Mac Pro roadmap in advance. In terms of sales, sure, the models that are selling the best are also the ones that have been refreshed recently: https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Mac https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Mac
- TheOtherHobbes 9y agoI think the grumblings are impacting the bottom line, and have penetrated the Cupertino distortion field. The slightly panicked assertion that "Hey we're working on new Macs for pro users" earlier this year is evidence of that. Previously the strategy seems to have been to put minimal effort into the Mac line and push it towards a closed kind-of-good-enough commodity platform designed to maximise margins not performance - basically a step up from the iPad range, for people who have an inexplicable legacy interest in real keyboards and bigger screens. That was a very bad mistake. It seems to be the case that Cook doesn't understand the pro market, and may even be vaguely hostile to it, for some reason. In fact there doesn't seem to be anyone at senior level cheerleading for professional users, and no reaching out for input from professional communities. I hope the grumblings have been loud enough to steer management back to reality. If not, we're just going to hold our noses and move back to Windows for professional creative software and Linux for everything else - which might seem like a small immediate loss, but will do massive damage to the Apple brand image.
- basseq 9y agoIt's not the "pro" market: Apple considers ~30% of their user base to be "pro". You wouldn't ignore that. Now, within the pro market, notebooks are far-and-away #1, iMacs are #2, and the Mac Pro is #3 (and is described as "single digit" sales percentage). Would you care about 1-3% vs. the other 97%? The problem is that that 1-3% are probably very vocal and the "trend-setters".