4 ms·

Basecamp | Ops/Sysadmin| Chicago, IL | REMOTE, Full-time, https://basecamp.com/ https://basecamp.com/ Basecamp solves the critical problems that every growing

Basecamp | Ops/Sysadmin| Chicago, IL | REMOTE, Full-time, https://basecamp.com/ https://basecamp.com/ Basecamp solves the critical problems that every growing business deals with. We say it’s the saner, calmer, organized way to manage projects and communicate company-wide. Basecamp Ops is responsible for infrastructure across 3 colocation sites in the United States and use both Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services too. We're heavily a Ruby on Rails shop though there's a few other languages hanging around in our deployments. If you are passionate about delivering fast and reliable sites at an awesome company that will respect you and help you grow personally and professionally please get in touch: https://basecamp.workable.com/j/A5A189B311 https://basecamp.workable.com/j/A5A189B311. (Oh yeah we have amazing benefits too: https://m.signalvnoise.com/employee-benefits-at-basecamp-d2d46fd06c58 https://m.signalvnoise.com/employee-benefits-at-basecamp-d2d...)

bogomipz 9y ago
Asking candidates to: 1) describe themselves in a thousand words or less 2) write up a mock outage report 3) pitch something new to "the team" just to submit their CV seems a little much. Pass.
- heavenlyhash 9y ago
  Counterpoint: I'm AOK with these ideas. I love take-home style interviews. They're without exception the most informative for both the interviewee and the company: much more can be conveyed than in a hour face-to-face, and it's less stressful both to produce and to review, and just plain less painful to schedule. Doing it before the in-person stage is a little unusual (maybe after the first phonecall, to confirm it's not a waste of time for a position that's already filled, etc, would make more sense?), but I respect the idea.
- themcgruff 9y ago
  Thanks for your feed back. It's understandable that this might be too much for some people. To date, we've had a single person skip those questions and still submit. This person was not a qualified applicant. Based on the applications we've received this very minimal list of requirements appears to be working as desired. We're interested in employees who are going to do the best work of their careers. I'm okay with having a slightly higher bar (in terms of application effort) for that type of person.
  - bogomipz 9y ago
    >"I'm okay with having a slightly higher bar (in terms of application effort) for that type of person." Asking people to jump through hoops is not raising any kind of bar.

bogomipz 9y ago

Asking candidates to: 1) describe themselves in a thousand words or less 2) write up a mock outage report 3) pitch something new to "the team" just to submit their CV seems a little much. Pass.

heavenlyhash 9y ago
Counterpoint: I'm AOK with these ideas. I love take-home style interviews. They're without exception the most informative for both the interviewee and the company: much more can be conveyed than in a hour face-to-face, and it's less stressful both to produce and to review, and just plain less painful to schedule. Doing it before the in-person stage is a little unusual (maybe after the first phonecall, to confirm it's not a waste of time for a position that's already filled, etc, would make more sense?), but I respect the idea.
themcgruff 9y ago
Thanks for your feed back. It's understandable that this might be too much for some people. To date, we've had a single person skip those questions and still submit. This person was not a qualified applicant. Based on the applications we've received this very minimal list of requirements appears to be working as desired. We're interested in employees who are going to do the best work of their careers. I'm okay with having a slightly higher bar (in terms of application effort) for that type of person.
- bogomipz 9y ago
  >"I'm okay with having a slightly higher bar (in terms of application effort) for that type of person." Asking people to jump through hoops is not raising any kind of bar.