I think you're being too quick to throw out the baby with the bath water. We know there are epidemiological risks to foregoing vaccination, dating to well befor

I think you're being too quick to throw out the baby with the bath water. We know there are epidemiological risks to foregoing vaccination, dating to well before peer review and drug manufacturer incentives were problematic. If you're concerned about the incentives of vaccine manufacturers to produce safe products (which is a reasonable position), I think a better response in this case is to call for more transparency in research and manufacturing. Why accept a known large risk in an attempt to reduce a risk that may not exist at all?