> it's not a neutral thing or a victimless crime like drug consumption Then we ban it. We're not banning the speech; we're banning the child abuse. Take a loo

> it's not a neutral thing or a victimless crime like drug consumption Then we ban it. We're not banning the speech; we're banning the child abuse. Take a look (figuratively, not necessarily literally) at loli/shota hentai - that's legal (at least here in the USA) because real people are not being harmed. Actual CP with actual children is banned because real people are being harmed. It's not suppression of free speech; it's protection against abuse.