3 ms·
Cancer Biology is a journal with an impact factor of 3.1 or thereabouts, that's the equivalent of wrapping paper. People in the sciences know whose work is soli
by HarryHirsch 10y ago
Cancer Biology is a journal with an impact factor of 3.1 or thereabouts, that's the equivalent of wrapping paper. People in the sciences know whose work is solid and whose isn't, with stuff like that you just go "Oh, it's XY again, with their usual rubbish", you don't even try to follow up. Broad & Wade called the phenomenon "the invisible boot". Required reading: https://www.amazon.com/-/dp/0192818899 https://www.amazon.com/-/dp/0192818899
A sociopath looks like the Sames-Sezen affair: http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2011/07/08/the_sames_sezen_fraud_case_holy_cow http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2011/07/08/the...
Even there a certain blogger said that he knew "Dali Sames not to be a nice person", whoever went there knew exactly what he was getting into.
- pmoriarty 10y agoJust out of curiosity, how did you find this journal's impact factor?
- HarryHirsch 10y agoThe publisher lists it right on the homepage: https://link.springer.com/journal/13277 https://link.springer.com/journal/13277 It's an important metric, of course they'd list it.