From a quick glance at the list of papers this seems to be mostly basic research. This makes it less likely that it could have affected treatment decisions. Th

From a quick glance at the list of papers this seems to be mostly basic research. This makes it less likely that it could have affected treatment decisions. The formal peer review during publication is a very coarse filter, and not well suited to catch outright fraud. It's more of a quick sanity check than an in depth examination. The real verification happens once other scientists build on that paper and perform new experiments.