3 ms·
Yes, but in common discussion, noone when talking about OOP is referring to inheritence-less OOP. No common programming language uses it, few to no programmers
by BoiledCabbage 10y ago
Yes, but in common discussion, noone when talking about OOP is referring to inheritence-less OOP. No common programming language uses it, few to no programmers practice it. OOP/w inheritance is the default item being discussed.
- horrido 10y agoAnd why is "common discussion" technically relevant? This is not a fault of OOP but of education.
- BoiledCabbage 10y agoYou're talking about about OOP-B, everyone here is talking about OOP-A. OOP-B isn't really a part of what's being discussed. Anyone can bring it up, but "education" isn't relevant here. It's not what was discussed in the article, or the comments.
- nailer 10y agoAs neither of you, I'm talking about OOP. Nobody's limiting the discussion to composition or inheritance. Otherwise we'd be talking about how 'inheritance sucks' rather than 'OOP sucks'.