2 ms·
"it is kind of waste to have 'n' copies of the OS loaded, so containers are a 'semantic' fractioning of the resources where the OS is common but the set of proc
by rsync 10y ago
"it is kind of waste to have 'n' copies of the OS loaded, so containers are a 'semantic' fractioning of the resources where the OS is common but the set of processes are unique to a client. You still need a way to allocate from the single set of resources so containers provide that abstraction."
Agreed. What I find so odd is that this problem was simply and elegantly solved in BSD with 'jail' and everyone went about their business.
I do not understand why (what appears to be) the linux answer to 'jail' is so complicated and fraught and the subject of so much discussion.
I am not sure that containers and their build scripts represent the $huge_profit_potential that people think they do ...