3 ms·
The thing is, the fees discussed in Germany ( ~1000€ / semester) are no where near covering the costs of a seat for one student. It's just a drop in the ocean,
by captainmuon 10y ago
The thing is, the fees discussed in Germany ( ~1000€ / semester) are no where near covering the costs of a seat for one student. It's just a drop in the ocean, so they might as well keep it free. And when tutition is free for Germans, it seems wierd and discriminatory to take fees from foreigners. I grew up in Germany, but don't have a German passport. Should I pay more? Where do you draw the line?
I was studying when they introduced the tutition fees around 2006, and protested against them. We strongly had the impression that it was never about covering costs, but rather an "educating" measure: to teach students that education has a monetary value, and so that they view themselves as customers.
In the US, people view their education usually as an investment on which they expect return (from this thread, "It makes absolute sense to go $250k in debt for an MIT or Harvard degree, makes less but still some sense for Tufts and Olin, and makes no sense at all for the rest."). Some people view it that way in Germany, too, but I think many others, like me, find that very strange. We study mainly whatever we are talented at, and what we enjoy. Financial considerations are made, but not the main driver.
I believe certain people find that mindset threatening or wrong, and work(ed) actively against it. In Germany most notably neoliberal and center/conservative think tanks, like Bertelsmann foundation. These organisations lobbied for tutition fees, but also for the introduction of the Bachelor+Master system, which is much more schoolish and streamlined than the old Diplom/Magister system (which let you more freedom to study at your own pace and according to our interests).
When I look at how the money from tutition fees was used, it didn't improve teaching at all (which was the stated goal), but we got fancy new desks and cashback for books (ridiculously). This reinforces my feeling that it was driven by ideology and not by necessity.
- sparkling 10y ago> when tutition is free for Germans, it seems wierd and discriminatory to take fees from foreigners German citizens subsidize this "free" university with their taxes. This includes low-level workers who have never visited a university. So essentially you are asking poor people in Germany to pay for the education of middle-class or rich people from other countries.
- louithethrid 10y agoThe poor dont pay much taxes in germany either. So its the middle class supporting a open world view. And i found it quite enriching. Sorry, that WYSIWYG doesent work with universitys, because you have by condition of usefullness not yet seen what you get and can only afterward value it apropriatly. I love the german enducation system. In it great endavours may still be possible.
- fauigerzigerk 10y agoAnd another country's tax payers have subsidized that student from preschool through primary and secondary education. Also, the implication of your argument is that graduate immigrants should get a tax break because tax payers never had to subsidize their degree.
- captainmuon 10y agoIndividually, sure, that's how taxes work. But it's a really skewed way of looking at it. Poor people who only have a bike and make minimum wage in a way pay with their taxes for freeways (or Autobahns) - even if they are never going to use them. Is the conclusion to stop building streets with tax money? Collectively, on average, poor people get more out of the state than they pay into it. If I'm rich, I will pay much more taxes than my kids will be able to use up by going to Uni. If I'm poor, it's the other way around (assuming we take advantage of it).