3 ms·
Archivists are in the business of preserving the past and like most people, they tend to overvalue what they are familiar with. But most old art, like all art,
by johan_larson 9y ago
Archivists are in the business of preserving the past and like most people, they tend to overvalue what they are familiar with. But most old art, like all art, is mediocre and very much of its time. After that, it quickly loses its value. And therefore preserving old art is only somewhat useful. Some works are good enough to stand the test of time, but those are in no danger of disappearing, because continuing interest means that natural commercial forces keep producing copies from generation to generation.
Even if all the archivists of the world lost their minds for a generation, we would be in no danger of losing the works of the Beatles, Hemingway, and Scorsese. What we might lose are large numbers of works by their less accomplished contemporaries. Would that be a real loss? Yes. A big one? No. And that's why it's simply not that important that the archivists succeed in preserving everything.
- jamiek88 9y agoNot sure popular necessarily equals accomplished.
- noir_lord 9y agoMe either particularly since a lot of what we consider "masterworks"/"master pieces" where often only moderately popular (if that) in their contemporary period.
- johan_larson 9y agoAs far as I can tell, that is very much the exception. The artists who are famous long after they are dead were typically famous during their lifetimes, too. Over in classical music, for instance, all of the top ten were (at least) distinguished professionals during their own lifetimes.