3 ms·
Oh I no doubt understood the author's intentions with using feign in that manner. However, that does not mean it was the correct term to use, despite what we ma
by matthewwiese 9y ago
Oh I no doubt understood the author's intentions with using feign in that manner. However, that does not mean it was the correct term to use, despite what we may "feel" or "get" from it; nevertheless, troubling ourselves with such a minor detail is really rather ridiculous. Besides, if we go any further, conversation on this runs the risk of igniting a rather banal descriptivist/prescriptivist flame war. :)
The closest term to describe what the author meant is I believe a litote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litotes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litotes
- edzorg 9y agoI think this is a good example of a 'well, actually.' https://www.recurse.com/manual#sec-environment https://www.recurse.com/manual#sec-environment
- jancsika 9y agoI'm not grandstanding. I can prove it by admitting I still don't understand the rule: If a newcomer expresses genuine surprise, are they breaking the "No feigning surprise" rule or not? edit: typo
- adrienne 9y agoThere is no "litote". "Litotes" is not a plural noun.