3 ms·

No. I try to be reasonable so I wasn't going to entertain conspiracy theories in my post (particularly when they are "convenient" scapegoats when combined with

No. I try to be reasonable so I wasn't going to entertain conspiracy theories in my post (particularly when they are "convenient" scapegoats when combined with vague, evasive finger-pointing from Facebook HQ -- always be sure to ask yourself "Qui bono?" when reading these public statements). I am fully aware of FB's misguided definition of "government propaganda" and wholeheartedly feel that it is a gross misuse of the word, so yes I am aware that the ACTUAL "propaganda" here didn't come from an existing government (nor would I commit the transgression of calling the public content "propaganda"). Once there is real proof (and not the left's version of WMDs), I will happily revise my views (from the article, FB declined to provide any or even blame anybody specific). For now, I am outraged that FB even felt compelled by certain groups to publish their own propaganda (this article).

sprafa 10y ago
The left's version of WMDs? It's funny that there wasn't a single propaganda campaign under Obama afaik that ever reached the depth of counterinformation as the Bush-Blair WMD campaign, yet everyone just uses the biggest lie the Bush administration ever peddled on Americans as some sort of evidence that every government does this. No they don't. Rumsfeld had to create a special office inside the Pentagon to manufacture evidence so the WMD case could be created. They didn't use the intelligence agencies, they went around them as much as they could to create "alternate facts". The idea that Obama has managed to do the same thing as Bush, but using 10 or so intelligence agencies to "manufacture evidence" is a lunacy. The Bush administration had to go through huge lengths to build up a false case for war. Obama just asked his intelligence agencies to give him their opinion. You can use the crimes of the Bush Admnistration to call anything and everything that comes out of government a lie. But all that you're doing is critiquing the Bush admnistration. Not all administrations are guilty of wildly deceiving the public.
- Hydraulix989 10y ago
  Well, I just so happen to think undermining the American democratic process by calling into question the legitimacy of the (undesired) election results is pretty serious. This has happened time and time again anytime we somehow end up electing a Republican...

sprafa 10y ago

The left's version of WMDs? It's funny that there wasn't a single propaganda campaign under Obama afaik that ever reached the depth of counterinformation as the Bush-Blair WMD campaign, yet everyone just uses the biggest lie the Bush administration ever peddled on Americans as some sort of evidence that every government does this. No they don't. Rumsfeld had to create a special office inside the Pentagon to manufacture evidence so the WMD case could be created. They didn't use the intelligence agencies, they went around them as much as they could to create "alternate facts". The idea that Obama has managed to do the same thing as Bush, but using 10 or so intelligence agencies to "manufacture evidence" is a lunacy. The Bush administration had to go through huge lengths to build up a false case for war. Obama just asked his intelligence agencies to give him their opinion. You can use the crimes of the Bush Admnistration to call anything and everything that comes out of government a lie. But all that you're doing is critiquing the Bush admnistration. Not all administrations are guilty of wildly deceiving the public.

Hydraulix989 10y ago
Well, I just so happen to think undermining the American democratic process by calling into question the legitimacy of the (undesired) election results is pretty serious. This has happened time and time again anytime we somehow end up electing a Republican...