3 ms·
There's a difference between reading the EULA/TOS and lying to gain access to something you shouldn't. If you're knowingly lying to gain access something, you
by VotreReb 9y ago
There's a difference between reading the EULA/TOS and lying to gain access to something you shouldn't.
If you're knowingly lying to gain access something, you don't need a EULA/TOS to know you shouldn't be doing it.
- blowski 9y agoYou are very defensive of PayPal in this thread. Do you have a connection with them in any way?
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y ago17 or 18 years old. It's an arbitrary distinction. I don't think many people would have an issue with anyone saying they were 18 to get an online account. This isn't the same as lying with the intent to cause harm. It would have been simpler for everyone if PayPal had given him an option to agree to new TOS now they've picked the discrepancy. Anyway, children can have bank accounts and own real estate and shares. Having a PayPal account at the age of 17 is less offensive than farting in an elevator.
- DanBC 9y ago> It's an arbitrary distinction. Paypal can enforce the contract terms against people 18 years old or older. They can't (in england) against people aged 17 or younger. > children can have bank accounts Those accounts are restricted.
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y agoTrue and true. I meant to say that we -society- has arbitrarily selected age 18 for enforcement of contracts.