3 ms·
they actually mention it in their readme. > it seemed logical and also it would really be bad if somebody did docker rm -f $(docker ps -qa) and deleted the en
by y4mi 10y ago
they actually mention it in their readme.
> it seemed logical and also it would really be bad if somebody did docker rm -f $(docker ps -qa) and deleted the entire OS
or are you asking why anyone would want a 'docker-os', which has everything but the docker daemon as a container?
- KaiserPro 10y agoNo no, I get the coreos idea, or providing libc, kernel docker service and nothing else. I saw that line, but since if you want to run docker at scale you'd have each execution node under the tight control of a scheduler, it seemed like a small edge case. As I said, for the ignorant such as myself why would I chose this over coreos?