8 ms·

I think JS ecosystem is an order of magnitude more unstable. I can still write a Django/Flask/Pyramid app in roughly the same way I did 5 years ago. The key lib

I think JS ecosystem is an order of magnitude more unstable. I can still write a Django/Flask/Pyramid app in roughly the same way I did 5 years ago. The key libraries have longer and more consistent development. The whole environment is just easier to use. Maybe I am biased from nearly a decade of heavy Pyhton use, but I have written a non-trivial amount of JS code. Angular 1 is basically a relic. It just isn't a user friendly sandbox to play in. Python has its warts but we build and use tools in Python and it seems much easier than JS.

ng12 9y ago
Is your complaint that JS development is getting better? People didn't ditch Angular1 because it was old, they ditched it because Angular2 is better.
- mercer 9y ago
  That's not saying much though. I keep reading that Angular 2 is still a really bad idea (haven't gotten to using it myself though). What's your experience comparing Angular 2 to other frameworks you've tried?
- bitexploder 9y ago
  I am just saying that the "newest" tools in Python are more stable and if you pick a popular framework or package in Python chances are good it will still be active years later. Whereas JS community seems to have ADHD and things like TypeScript come along in the JS world. The cost of learning and staying modern in JS and front end development in particular is high. It does create meaningful new ideas but it is a mess compared to investing in almost any other popular language. So, I learned Angular 1 for a project. Some concept there really are everywhere (promises, DI), but you might as well not even call Anuglar 2 Angular. It is totally different and even getting started in it took so much effort I gave up. I have almost never done that as a hacker. But the sheer amount of stuff to install and learn just to implement Hello World was more than I was willing to deal with at the time.
  - zackify 9y ago
    It's not as high as you would think. Everyone here loves to complain how fast things come along but the following is true for any language. If you know the fundamentals of JS you can do anything. It's not hard to spend a Saturday trying out Vue or webpack or React and decide what stack is best for your company. If you can't spend the time to find the right tooling and your excuse is that things move too fast, it sounds like you're complaining about learning and using the latest technologies, which I don't get as a developer. I personally find it exciting how everything is going. It's also easy to stick to your stack thanks to yarn which will lock in your dependencies so you don't have to worry. Lastly, creating a hello world app in React or vue can be extremely simple. I haven't used angular much so I can't attest to it. But after all that, I can see why some people would be frustrated. Being on the inside and doing js for the past 3 years it's more exciting than looking in. We keep getting new awesome language additions as of late!
    - bitexploder 9y ago
      I do worry it's just a Python bias I have. But it clearly isn't just me. I have been using Go and can get things done there pretty easily. JS th language isn't any harder than Go or Python. It isn't the language. If I spent a few years my senses would be honed for avoiding traps -- but I feel I can do that in many other languages and ecosystems much easier as a novice. Maybe it is just the size of th JS world.
pfooti 9y ago
You can still write an Express, Jade, haml, whatever app like it is 2011. The js world moves fast, but the old libraries are still out there. Plenty of people writing jquery or knockout code. Web dev has a fast cycle time, mainly (imo) because products are created and used and discarded quickly - lots of websites are short-lived one offs. So, naturally, there's churn. And as to what my sibling commenter said, I agree. I'm starting to move from angular 1 to 2, and 2 is better. It has some downright amazing features, and the tooling is quite excellent. That's why, personally, I'm learning the new thing.
- ern 9y ago
  I'm starting to move from angular 1 to 2, and 2 is better. Angular 4, you mean (or just "Angular").
- alttab 9y ago
  I'm still in the Rails/Bootstrap/jQuery camp. When you need something quick, that will function, and not look like shit - you really can't beat this option. It's also easy to teach junior developers, and they strengthen on the fundamentals first.
  - zackify 9y ago
    Needing something quick is subjective honestly. Personally I could build you a service worker that makes your app offline capable and throw in React components on whatever pages you need, or setup a whole React / vue / vanilla js / whatever app structure in 30 minutes thanks to the time I've spent investigating good packages to use. So I'd say there's many options that are great and it's sad to see people here in this thread (not you) complain that there's so much js churn when isn't the whole reason We are developers because we have a passion for constant learning and building cool things?
    - bitexploder 9y ago
      It is true and you are correct t but as a JS novice it is very hard to know which things are good and which are just new junk.I love learning and mastering things as much as the next individual. (BTW I have moved to Vue when I need a fancier front end and Love it). I guess my complaint, if you can call it that, is that it is hard to find the good stuff and easy to spend hours fighting node packages and Packers and get nowhere.

ng12 9y ago

Is your complaint that JS development is getting better? People didn't ditch Angular1 because it was old, they ditched it because Angular2 is better.

mercer 9y ago
That's not saying much though. I keep reading that Angular 2 is still a really bad idea (haven't gotten to using it myself though). What's your experience comparing Angular 2 to other frameworks you've tried?
bitexploder 9y ago
I am just saying that the "newest" tools in Python are more stable and if you pick a popular framework or package in Python chances are good it will still be active years later. Whereas JS community seems to have ADHD and things like TypeScript come along in the JS world. The cost of learning and staying modern in JS and front end development in particular is high. It does create meaningful new ideas but it is a mess compared to investing in almost any other popular language. So, I learned Angular 1 for a project. Some concept there really are everywhere (promises, DI), but you might as well not even call Anuglar 2 Angular. It is totally different and even getting started in it took so much effort I gave up. I have almost never done that as a hacker. But the sheer amount of stuff to install and learn just to implement Hello World was more than I was willing to deal with at the time.
- zackify 9y ago
  It's not as high as you would think. Everyone here loves to complain how fast things come along but the following is true for any language. If you know the fundamentals of JS you can do anything. It's not hard to spend a Saturday trying out Vue or webpack or React and decide what stack is best for your company. If you can't spend the time to find the right tooling and your excuse is that things move too fast, it sounds like you're complaining about learning and using the latest technologies, which I don't get as a developer. I personally find it exciting how everything is going. It's also easy to stick to your stack thanks to yarn which will lock in your dependencies so you don't have to worry. Lastly, creating a hello world app in React or vue can be extremely simple. I haven't used angular much so I can't attest to it. But after all that, I can see why some people would be frustrated. Being on the inside and doing js for the past 3 years it's more exciting than looking in. We keep getting new awesome language additions as of late!
  - bitexploder 9y ago
    I do worry it's just a Python bias I have. But it clearly isn't just me. I have been using Go and can get things done there pretty easily. JS th language isn't any harder than Go or Python. It isn't the language. If I spent a few years my senses would be honed for avoiding traps -- but I feel I can do that in many other languages and ecosystems much easier as a novice. Maybe it is just the size of th JS world.

pfooti 9y ago

You can still write an Express, Jade, haml, whatever app like it is 2011. The js world moves fast, but the old libraries are still out there. Plenty of people writing jquery or knockout code. Web dev has a fast cycle time, mainly (imo) because products are created and used and discarded quickly - lots of websites are short-lived one offs. So, naturally, there's churn. And as to what my sibling commenter said, I agree. I'm starting to move from angular 1 to 2, and 2 is better. It has some downright amazing features, and the tooling is quite excellent. That's why, personally, I'm learning the new thing.

ern 9y ago
I'm starting to move from angular 1 to 2, and 2 is better. Angular 4, you mean (or just "Angular").
alttab 9y ago
I'm still in the Rails/Bootstrap/jQuery camp. When you need something quick, that will function, and not look like shit - you really can't beat this option. It's also easy to teach junior developers, and they strengthen on the fundamentals first.
- zackify 9y ago
  Needing something quick is subjective honestly. Personally I could build you a service worker that makes your app offline capable and throw in React components on whatever pages you need, or setup a whole React / vue / vanilla js / whatever app structure in 30 minutes thanks to the time I've spent investigating good packages to use. So I'd say there's many options that are great and it's sad to see people here in this thread (not you) complain that there's so much js churn when isn't the whole reason We are developers because we have a passion for constant learning and building cool things?
  - bitexploder 9y ago
    It is true and you are correct t but as a JS novice it is very hard to know which things are good and which are just new junk.I love learning and mastering things as much as the next individual. (BTW I have moved to Vue when I need a fancier front end and Love it). I guess my complaint, if you can call it that, is that it is hard to find the good stuff and easy to spend hours fighting node packages and Packers and get nowhere.