3 ms·
No. At least, not in the case of graph computation. This was the conventional wisdom with some people, but circa a year or so ago when we did some measurements,
by frankmcsherry 9y ago
No. At least, not in the case of graph computation. This was the conventional wisdom with some people, but circa a year or so ago when we did some measurements, no.
https://github.com/frankmcsherry/blog/blob/master/posts/2015-07-08.md https://github.com/frankmcsherry/blog/blob/master/posts/2015...
https://github.com/frankmcsherry/blog/blob/master/posts/2015-07-31.md https://github.com/frankmcsherry/blog/blob/master/posts/2015...
If you don't want to read everything (but you should, before trusting the conclusions), the relevant measurements are here:
https://github.com/frankmcsherry/blog/blob/master/posts/2015-07-08.md#multiple-computers-1g-vs-10g https://github.com/frankmcsherry/blog/blob/master/posts/2015...
Edit: Reading the paper, they cite these measurements and present their work as "only [..] 8.8× slower than a distributed in-memory" system (GraM, a different system than timely dataflow). The quote is on the first page.