5 ms·
This actually was a Ti-83+, I just got the model number wrong. I don't recall the specifics, but I believe the flash didn't store everything I needed through re
by Declanomous 9y ago
This actually was a Ti-83+, I just got the model number wrong. I don't recall the specifics, but I believe the flash didn't store everything I needed through reformatting, or my programs were too large to fit entirely within the flash.
I think the ti-84 actually had a USB port (or a redesigned port of some sort), which eliminated this issue.
- khedoros1 9y agoThe flash was a lot larger than the RAM, but I think you could only store programs there, maybe. Data tables, strings, and such might've needed to be stored in RAM. I feel for your loss though, whatever the circumstances were. The first graphing calculator I had access to was a TI-81. No flash space, RAM only. And since it had been my mother's when she went back to college, by the time I was using it, the button battery was pretty "iffy".