4 ms·
I spent my last two years of high school at a jesuit (catholic) school. The only thing I really remember from my senior religion class was "you have to believe
by taxicabjesus 9y ago
I spent my last two years of high school at a jesuit (catholic) school. The only thing I really remember from my senior religion class was "you have to believe something".
The class' assignment was to write a paper about what you believe. I wrote a crappy paper about how I didn't believe in an afterlife anymore, on account of my head injury [1]. We all evaluated someone else's paper, and I got a paper from someone who talked about his out-of-body experiences, which I thought was a perfectly reasonable proposition, as I'd recently learned about "mental imagery" (this was before 'aphantasia' [2] was a term)...
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13123659 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13123659
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia
Modern science was founded on the predication that "everything in the universe can be explained in terms of matter." This was circa-1845. The predication would have been more useful if those early scientists thought in terms of 'energy', but we're still stuck with their mistake.
- theseatoms 9y agoIn what way are we stuck with that mistake? Interesting story btw.
- taxicabjesus 9y ago> In what way are we stuck with that mistake? Thermodynamics was useful to design better steam engines, circa-1845. Thermodynamics is a rigid straitjacket that limits modern astronomers' ability to explain their observations. > Interesting story btw. Thanks for this. Someone voted me down right away, then some other users canceled that downvote out. The crowd here is fickle. :)