> "We're not arguing for censorship, we're just arguing for - take it off the page" I actually facepalmed at this. These people know that impression drives re

> "We're not arguing for censorship, we're just arguing for - take it off the page" I actually facepalmed at this. These people know that impression drives reality. They're basically saying "so hey, we found this great slippery slope that looks like a lot of fun!" What the hell? The grail for algorithms should be to HELP display/persist the disproof of misinformation, objectively and efficiently. Not just to HIDE it and hope it goes away!