"Computer programs can gamble better than gamblers" Sorry to say, but I'm completely unsurprised by this - statistical analysis is the most sensible approach t

"Computer programs can gamble better than gamblers" Sorry to say, but I'm completely unsurprised by this - statistical analysis is the most sensible approach to the problem. Gamblers tend to be less sensible and calling a gambler a stock market trading pro doesn't stop him being a gambler... I'd also be wary of labeling pros in a system which will naturally produce "lucky" and "unlucky" individuals regardless of skill... at least some proportion of successful traders are just lucky. I can't measure it, but it seems very heavily implied...