4 ms·
Also from what I've seen, the typical peripherals around a automotive uC differ greatly from a ARM "entertainment" SoC and that's whats the bigger difference. e
by zeroflow 9y ago
Also from what I've seen, the typical peripherals around a automotive uC differ greatly from a ARM "entertainment" SoC and that's whats the bigger difference.
e.g. Infineon TC29xx http://www.infineon.com/export/sites/default/media/products/Microcontrollers/32bit/TC29xT_Block_Diagram.JPG http://www.infineon.com/export/sites/default/media/products/... vs Snapdragon 820 http://files.linuxgizmos.com/einfochips_eragon820_com_block.jpg http://files.linuxgizmos.com/einfochips_eragon820_com_block.... Block Diagrams
In both of those chips the CPUs themselfes are the smallest part but the on chip peripherals differ greatly by usecase. The automotive has a great plethora of different busses and i/o (digital, analog, complex PWM, CAN, LIN, FlexRay) while the typical ARM core has less but higher bandwith IOs.
The other big step is backwards compatibility. Going to a completely different architecture is a bigger step than going from one iteration to the next one.
So probably even the "new" designs for 2020 may use the successor of the current generation of uC or SoC chips.
- Matthias247 9y agoYes, peripherals differ. But that's not related to ARM vs sth. else but generally for automotive-specific vs other domain. Automotive specific ARM SoCs will contain the same peripherals than their RH850, PPC, etc. counterparts if required. Smartphone specific SoCs will of course favor other peripherals. But these won't be directly used in automotive anyway, because they are lacking the required certifications (temperature range, etc...)