3 ms·
I feel that it's because of the initial hype. You get more eyes on the problem, which generally creates more interest as people publish their results. As much
by opless 9y ago
I feel that it's because of the initial hype. You get more eyes on the problem, which generally creates more interest as people publish their results.
As much of the results (that get reported) are in computer vision that generates more interest from the less technical, and you get that critical mass where projects like Twitter and Facebook start growing simply because it's being talked about so much.
The GA and Symbolic fields seem to be languishing only because relatively speaking no one is talking about them. Also by now it's probably easier to get funding for "deep learning".