5 ms·
Akszualli dis is en obsfuskejszon juzing an akszual slawik lenguydz (uidaut juzing speszal slawik karakters but that // łud potenszalli bi iwen more obfuskejted
by krige 9y ago
Akszualli dis is en obsfuskejszon juzing an akszual slawik lenguydz (uidaut juzing speszal slawik karakters but that // łud potenszalli bi iwen more obfuskejted). Ol klir?
- chx 9y agoAll clear, yes except for 'uidaut' and 'łud' -- is the latter "would"?
- jwilk 9y agouidaut = without łud = would
- chx 9y agoLávly konszept. Ju kud ívön tráj úzing en ívön mór disztant lengvidzs, Hángérien det iz. Áj wándör háu mács of disz iz komprihenziböl tu ádörz :D
- igorpavlov 9y agoI find the comparison with Slavic languages quite funny :) Just keep in mind, simple transliteration is easily reversible. Spellfucker - not.
- chx 9y agoIt's not a straight transliteration -- it's not like we are writing IPA phonetic marks by-the-by in two different languages. For example your "th" in "thing" doesn't exist in Hungarian so I will use "sz" which by the way is one of the common pronunciation mistakes we make: replacing /θ/ with /s/. There are sounds in Hungarian which do not exist in English and yet if I wanted to "encode" the word "duke" I would likely use "gyúk" thus replacing /djuːk/ with /ɟu:k/.
- jwilk 9y agoYour digraphs and trigraphs make my head hurt... Translation: Lovely concept. You could even try using an even more distant language, Hungarian that is. I wonder how much of this is comprehensible to others.
- chx 9y agoNicely done! So it works. I badly want to see the software, however, which can do the same translation.
- tasuki 9y agoI find it amusing how big the differences are between the Slavic languages. So, krige is obviously Polish (not even trying to hide it with the ł, but also using "sz" for "sh"). My guess would be xixixao is Czech or Slovak. Correct?
- xixixao 9y agoCzech, correct. I didn't use our letters for the sounds easily replecated in english, so sh and ch would be š and č in Czech.