3 ms·
Sounds like the algorithm doesn't care whether or not you liked somebody. So even for a very indifferent person liking, say 1 in 2 people you're still likely ge
by auganov 10y ago
Sounds like the algorithm doesn't care whether or not you liked somebody. So even for a very indifferent person liking, say 1 in 2 people you're still likely getting a nonoptimal result. And AFAIK the whole point of this app is mutual likes?
- jameslk 10y agoI think the algorithm solves the problem of which photo, out of a set of photos, is the best one to show. So nothing has changed regarding the mutuality aspect, only which photo of the user is their best photo based on data collected from past swipes. In other words, they're continuously rotating through a user's photos, trying to find the one that gets the most positive feedback and showing that one more often than the user's other photos.
- wapz 10y agoI think the algorithm would show which photo the "most" users would like is. What if you're someone who loves cats like no other and puts a cat on your shoulder (or wears a cat t-shirt or something). You're probably going to have a lot less "likes" than a "normal" picture of you, but the odds of you getting along might be much lower (I'm sure the average individual likes cat people less than the person who picked a person with cats in their picture).
- jameslk 10y agoIt seems the shallowness of starting on the footing of what someone looks like alone kind of renders this point moot. If you're trying to identify compatibility based on who a person really is, their profile photo may be the least ideal place to start. If anything, I think this at least gets the user a foot in the door more often.
- auganov 10y agoIf the set of people you like has a different preference vs everybody then clearly, you're getting the wrong result.