17 ms·

> Linux will never evolve Do you terribly mind elaborating on this rather bold statement?

• deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
• silentbicycle 16y ago
  Rob Pike already has: http://herpolhode.com/rob/utah2000.pdf http://herpolhode.com/rob/utah2000.pdf
• rpledge 16y ago
  Great way to edit my comment, what I actually said was: > Linux will never evolve if the programming paradigm stays in the 60s C is a great language, but I firmly believe that OOP creates more maintainable code that is more robust. Sure, a simple C program is easy to understand, but the kernel isn't an easy program. Don't get me wrong, C++ has major downsides, but C isn't a magic bullet.
  • nitrogen 16y ago
    The kernel does use object-oriented paradigms.
    • sophacles 16y ago
      The kernel is also shockingly simple. Sure there are some tricky bits, but writing kernel code is very straight-forward. In fact every time I've written kernel code it has always been a "it can't really be this simple" type moment -- but some of that code is still running production machines today so... it must have been. NOTE: this is not me bragging, it's me suggesting the mystique is a bit undeserved.
      • nitrogen 16y ago
        I definitely agree. It is the simplicity of the POSIX userspace APIs and the Linux kernel internals that make me enjoy Linux so much. I still think there is some art to writing simple, efficient code, though. Most system-level code looks quite simple when it's done, but it may have taken several iterations to get it fast, clean, and small enough (particularly on embedded devices -- I once had to find 200 spare bytes to fit a bug fix in a 256KB firmware by hand optimizing various ancient parts of the code base).
      • beagle3 16y ago
        Well, the kernel is so shockingly simple in part BECAUSE no one let C++ in. And it is a testament to Linus' great leadership and censorship that it remains that way.
    • deleted 16y ago
      [deleted]