He attempted to use the multi-dimensionality of intelligence to make the following claim: > Intelligence is not a single dimension, so “smarter than humans” is

He attempted to use the multi-dimensionality of intelligence to make the following claim: > Intelligence is not a single dimension, so “smarter than humans” is a meaningless concept. This is poor reasoning. The fact that intelligence is multi-dimensional has no bearing on our ability to declare something smarter than us. It isn't at all meaningless. Because of this he claims that there will be no super-human AI. Via analogy. He says, "you can't compare two football players because one may be stronger, while another if faster." So the concept of "better" is meaningless. And no player can be declared better. My response is that's absurd. A simple counter-example, a single player can be both strong and faster, and thus clearly better.