3 ms·
This may be because their OS X version hasn't reached the same yet. So they have 2, essentially completely separate products with at least mostly separate codeb
by problems 9y ago
This may be because their OS X version hasn't reached the same yet. So they have 2, essentially completely separate products with at least mostly separate codebases, "SourceTree for Windows" and "SourceTree for OS X", each with their own versioning.
So it really is "SourceTree for Windows 2.0", not "SourceTree 2.0 for Windows".
- gattilorenz 9y ago"SourceTree for Windows, version 2.0" would be much better (here, at least. On their webpage it's much less ambiguous of course)